Skip to content
59

garten pflanzen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 71Conversion 13Competition 88Returns 100Price range 78Avg price 80Brand share 20Review moat 75Quality gap 96

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Great27%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€17.13

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€3.75–€56.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great497.12

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+54.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad92%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Conversion

Bad1.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€22K

€22K/yr · 128K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (27% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

14

Top-5 brand share

92%

Open market

6%

  • BALDUR Garten48%
  • GardenersDream25%
  • Blumen-Senf9%
  • Plantenwelt7%
  • Bloomique4%
  • Stauden Gänge2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€4474%€8936%€1K8%€2K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 77 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 62 weeks — +54.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '26MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 16.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Pflanzenwachstum54%

“Blumenpracht”

Qualität insgesamt22%

“super Produkt”

Farbe4%

“Tricolor”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Es sieht genauso aus wie auf dem Foto”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“fairer Preis”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Stärke2%

“Super robuste Pflanze bekommen”

Feucht/Trocken2%

“schön feucht”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung1%

“Anleitung Super”

Haltbarkeit0%

“erfteuen sich hoffentlich eines langen Lebens”

What buyers complain about

Pflanzenwachstum30%

“Pflanze verfault”

Gesamtgröße23%

“Alles fängt mal klein an”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Unverschämtheit”

Feucht/Trocken9%

“Alle trocken schade”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Schade uns Geld”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Sah nicht so aus wie auf dem Photo”

Haltbarkeit3%

“1 nach einer Woche tot”

Farbe3%

“Tricolor”

Stärke1%

“Sieht etwas dürftig aus”

Funktionalität insgesamt1%

“Finger weg. Wächst nix”

Top return reasons

Pflanzenwachstum28%
Feucht/Trocken24%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%
Gesamtgröße11%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Haltbarkeit1%
Farbe1%