Skip to content
58

flockungsmittel pool kartuschen

Worth a look

Shows demand growing >1,000% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 25Growth 100Conversion 96Competition 17Returns 99Price range 74Avg price 76Brand share 31Review moat 54Quality gap 38

Growth

Incredible>1,000%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible13.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€15.52

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€10.52–€27.66

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,329.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€100K

€100K/yr · 47K searches

Competition

Bad80%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 80% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

9 rising

Sellers

40

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

9%

  • Höfer Chemie24%
  • STEINBACH19%
  • AGUALEVE18%
  • Veddelholzer17%
  • Nasswerk8%
  • TerraUno4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 9%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€5K10%€10K15%€15K20%€20K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 10 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — >1,000% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 135.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt29%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt18%

“Hält das was es verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Zum fairen Preis, wird wieder bestellt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Einfach praktisch”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Alles super Wasser ist super geworden”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Und hält lange”

Filterung4%

“Es bindet die Mikropartikel hervorragend, führt sie gezielt ins Filtersystem und sorgt dafür, dass sie dort bleiben und nicht wieder durch den Filter gehen”

Einfache Reinigung4%

“Absolut empfehlenswert für einen sauberen Pool”

Materialqualität3%

“Kaufempfehlung, super Material”

Reinheit3%

“Wundermittel”

What buyers complain about

Filterung25%

“Für Filterbälle nicht wirklich geeignet”

Funktionalität insgesamt25%

“Unwirksam”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt17%

“Falsche angabe”

Verklemmen/Verstopfen17%

“Flockmittel schäumt”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Wer billig kauft, kauf zweimal”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße32%
Filterung24%
Funktionalität insgesamt15%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%
Gewicht schwer2%
Zertifizierungen2%
Auslaufsicher2%