Skip to content
58

ersatzdach pavillon 3x4

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 74Conversion 13Competition 77Returns 98Price range 45Avg price 90Brand share 36Review moat 66Quality gap 96

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€59.49

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Good+58.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good877.49

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€35.09–€179.18

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Bad1.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€25K

€25K/yr · 42K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

12 falling

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

11%

  • Outsunny26%
  • QUICK STAR22%
  • Spetebo19%
  • freigarten.de10%
  • Primaster7%
  • habeig5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€7476%€1K9%€2K12%€3K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 37 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +58.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 12.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße37%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Super Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“günstiger Preis”

Wasserbeständigkeit6%

“echt wasserdicht für den Preis echt okay”

Materialqualität4%

“Material super”

Montage/Installation3%

“Schnelle Montage und stabiler Halt mit kleinem Kritikpunkt”

Stärke3%

“Ansonsten hat das Verdeck einen robusten und guten Eindruck gemacht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Alles super und wie beschrieben”

Kissen2%

“Guter Sitz und viele Klettverschlüsse”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Easy”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße30%

“Passt nicht”

Haltbarkeit12%

“Schnell Defekt”

Materialqualität7%

“Furchtbares material”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Ware mangelhaft”

Wasserbeständigkeit4%

“sich das Wasser doch sammelt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Entspricht nicht der Beschreibung”

Montage/Installation3%

“konnte es aber noch nicht aufbauen.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Die 70/80 Euro die es kostet ist es nicht einmal im Ansatz wert”

Farbe2%

“Zu klein, verliert sehr schnell seine Farbe”

Gewicht schwer2%

“Geht etwas schwer drauf”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße83%
Farbe6%
Nähen/Finish/Polieren2%
Montage2%
Add-Ons/Anhänge2%
Wasserbeständigkeit2%
Materialqualität2%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Auslaufsicher1%