Skip to content
56

enders terrassenheizer

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.5%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 59Growth 23Conversion 14Competition 80Returns 85Price range 27Avg price 58Brand share 56Review moat 81Quality gap 76

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great385.04

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great35%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€481K

€481K/yr · 279K searches

Avg price

Good€151.32

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Okay€11.66–€326.58

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-4.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (35% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

22 rising

Sellers

62

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

22%

  • Enders35%
  • ACTIVA10%
  • KESSER10%
  • Zelsius9%
  • APANA7%
  • Planika7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€14K6%€29K9%€43K12%€58K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 45 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt26%

“Leistung super”

Montage/Installation12%

“Aufbau komplett easy”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Hält was die Werbung verspricht”

Heizung9%

“macht schnell wohlige Wärme”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Unschlagbarer Preis”

Gesamtgröße6%

“passt millimetergenau”

Design insgesamt5%

“Sehr schönes Design”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“sollte jeder easy hinbekommen.”

Effizienz2%

“Es macht was es soll”

Stärke1%

“stark”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Ungenügende Qualität”

Haltbarkeit12%

“Nach wenigen Tagen defekt”

Heizung10%

“Aber er bringt keine Wärme”

Defekt Material/Teile7%

“Kleines Teil defekt”

Montage/Installation7%

“aufwändiger Zusammenbau”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Sicherheitsvorschriften entsprechen nicht der Produktpräsentation bei Amazon”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Das hat mich 10,60 € Paketgebühr gekostet”

Dicke3%

“Ziemlich dünnes Material”

Wartung und Reparatur3%

“Droht dann mit hohen Kosten bei einer Einsendung zwecks Reparatur”

Entflammbar2%

“es ist nur noch Glut in der Feuerstelle.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße29%
Defekt Material/Teile16%
Funktionalität insgesamt10%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Farbe4%
Heizung3%
Entflammbar3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Produktzustand2%
Montage/Installation2%