Skip to content
65

chlor

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +775.3% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 59Growth 100Conversion 78Competition 30Returns 99Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 24Review moat 50Quality gap 48

Growth

Incredible+775.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€32.33

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€9.87–€80.00

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good€491K

€491K/yr · 194K searches

Review moat

Okay1,503.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay67%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Bad90%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 67% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

6%

  • Höfer Chemie55%
  • ABACUS12%
  • HERRLAN PSM12%
  • Veddelholzer7%
  • Söll5%
  • IBA3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€49K20%€98K30%€147K40%€196K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +775.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
45K35KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 24.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt35%

“Top Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt17%

“Erfüllt seinen Zweck”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Super Produkt zum Top Preis”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Wirkt wunderbar im Pool”

Filterung4%

“Filter war sauber”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Mit Granulat hatten wir den Pool immer schön sauber”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Farbe2%

“Grünes milchiges Wasser”

Reinheit2%

“Klares Wasser”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt25%

“Leider unwirksam”

Wasserbeständigkeit10%

“Da half dann nur noch das Wasser komplett ablassen”

Kontamination10%

“Chlor Flüssig”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Das Produkt hält leider sein Versprechen nicht”

Filterung6%

“Die Filteranlage lief tagelang”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Gut aber teuer”

Geruch5%

“Aber es riecht einfach nur noch Wasser”

Auslaufsicher3%

“Kam ausgelaufen und verklebt an, kanns nicht zurücksenden, da ich’s dringend brauche.”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung2%

“Leider hat das Mittel gar nicht geholfen, obwohl ich es genau nach Anleitung durchgeführt habe”

Griff2%

“Rutschiger, schleimiger Boden”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt26%
Auslaufsicher20%
Gesamtgröße14%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Geruch4%
Produktzustand3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%
Haltbarkeit1%
Kontamination1%