Skip to content
57

campinggrill

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +199.4% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 11Growth 97Conversion 10Competition 61Returns 72Price range 43Avg price 88Brand share 58Review moat 68Quality gap 75

Growth

Incredible+199.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great€63.42

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Good2.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good762.55

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Okay€12.00–€207.78

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad€45K

€45K/yr · 92K searches

Conversion

Bad0.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

98

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

24%

  • Campingaz37%
  • AGM13%
  • Enders7%
  • Charmline7%
  • WixbFyn7%
  • SunJas6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€2K10%€4K15%€7K20%€9K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +199.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KPrime Day '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Grillen19%

“Super Grill”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Premium Qualität”

Montage/Installation9%

“Ich habe ihn bestellt, bekommen und gleich versucht aufzubauen”

Einfache Reinigung8%

“super zu reinigen,”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Super für 20€”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Bedienung einfach super”

Portabilität5%

“Ideal zum mitnehmen oder direkt am Tisch”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Kompaktheit5%

“Kompakt und robust erfüllt die Erwartungen”

Stärke4%

“robust”

What buyers complain about

Grillen15%

“Probleme mit Grill sind Amazon bekannt”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Qualitätsproblem”

Rost/Korrodieren9%

“sehr sterk verrostete Beine”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Einziger Nachteil die Handschuhe sind absurd winzig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Ist mit rund 20 Euro nicht billig”

Stärke4%

“Allerdings wirkt das Material teilweise etwas dünn und bei stärkerer Hitze merkt man, dass es kein besonders massiver Grill ist”

Montage/Installation3%

“Das einschrauben der Beine ist etwas tricky”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Die Reinigung in der Spülmaschine gelingt allerdings nur bedingt”

Lackqualität2%

“Sehr einfaches dünnes Malerial”

Entflammbar2%

“Feuer fängt”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße33%
Grillen10%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Gewicht schwer6%
Funktionalität insgesamt5%
Rost/Korrodieren3%
Mechanismus probleme2%
Montage/Installation2%
Materialqualität2%