Skip to content
71

brunnen garten

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +208.0% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 69Growth 98Conversion 4Competition 90Returns 85Price range 27Avg price 72Brand share 73Review moat 67Quality gap 81

Growth

Incredible+208.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Great25%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Good€108.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€714K

€714K/yr · 1.9M searches

Review moat

Good804.36

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€8.91–€326.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (25% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

28 falling

Sellers

51

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

34%

  • Arnusa24%
  • Teamson Home14%
  • Bumilgar10%
  • Outsunny8%
  • AMUR6%
  • Dehner5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€21K6%€43K9%€64K12%€86K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 85 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +208.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KPrime Day '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 17.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Preis Leistung ok”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Super schönes Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Wie auf dem Foto”

Montage/Installation9%

“Die Installation war unkompliziert”

Design insgesamt8%

“schönes Design”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Mega easy”

Sprühen/Durchfluss4%

“Super Brunnen”

Geräuschpegel4%

“angenehmer Plätscher Sound”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passt”

Effizienz3%

“Funktioniert super”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit29%

“Leider schnell defekt”

Funktionalität insgesamt14%

“Funktioniert nicht 100 %”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Teurer Müll”

Gesamtgröße4%

“sieht mini aus”

Sprühen/Durchfluss4%

“Optisch ok leider spritzt die Pumpe das wasser aus der schale, weil diese zu klein ist”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Teile unvollständig”

Geräuschpegel3%

“laut”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“keine 5€ wert”

Auslaufsicher2%

“Undicht”

Wasserbeständigkeit2%

“Pumpe läuft ohne Wasser einfach weiter”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt33%
Gesamtgröße15%
Haltbarkeit12%
Defekt Material/Teile11%
Wasserbeständigkeit4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Stärke2%
Sprühen/Durchfluss2%
Geräuschpegel2%