Skip to content
63

blumentreppe draußen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 12Growth 85Conversion 7Competition 87Returns 96Price range 91Avg price 95Brand share 67Review moat 47Quality gap 67

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€32.70

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€12.21–€73.77

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Great+84.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay1,763.73

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€48K

€48K/yr · 276K searches

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

34 falling

Sellers

58

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

31%

  • Bamworld26%
  • Relaxdays12%
  • Bomclap10%
  • Yaheetech9%
  • Outsunny9%
  • TTL HOME4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€9574%€2K6%€3K8%€4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 77 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +84.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 11.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation26%

“leichte Montage, stabil”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Beste Produkt”

Stärke11%

“Stabiles Regal”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis Leistung ok”

Design insgesamt7%

“Design”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Wie abgebildet,”

Speicherkapazität3%

“Regal”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Luftig und praktisch”

Pflanzenwachstum2%

“Stabiles Pflanzen-Regal”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Qualität musste eigentlich stimmen”

Montage/Installation13%

“Noch nicht zusammengebaut”

Stärke7%

“Leider instabil - trägt keine Blumentöpfe”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität7%

“Sehr instabil und wackelig”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Fällt kleiner aus als gedacht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Größe und Funktion fraglich preis super”

Defekt Material/Teile4%

“Teile fehlen”

Holzqualität3%

“Das Holz wirkt allerdings eher günstig verarbeitet”

Rost/Korrodieren3%

“Ein Regaleinsatz verrostet”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Nach einem Jahr verrottet”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße38%
Defekt Material/Teile14%
Montage/Installation7%
Farbe6%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Holzqualität4%
Materialqualität3%
Montage3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Gleichgewicht/Stabilität2%