Skip to content
55

blumentopf hoch

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 15% of clicks), but weak search conversion (0.6%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 13Growth 31Conversion 8Competition 96Returns 96Price range 80Avg price 94Brand share 80Review moat 65Quality gap 33

Competition

Incredible15%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€22.46

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Great55%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Great€3.97–€63.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good884.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+4.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€52K

€52K/yr · 389K searches

Conversion

Bad0.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (15% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

38 falling

Sellers

92

Top-5 brand share

55%

Open market

40%

  • Tymar24%
  • Lechuza10%
  • KONZEPT8%
  • elho7%
  • HappyFlower5%
  • Plastard5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%€5252%€1K3%€2K4%€2K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 150 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +4.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt32%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Preis Leistung Optimal”

Stärke10%

“Sehr robust”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Genau wie auf den Fotos”

Design insgesamt8%

“Das Design ist modern”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Mega praktisch”

Pflanzenwachstum3%

“Perfekt auch für größere Pflanzen”

Gewicht leicht2%

“Sie sind leicht”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich2%

“Ideal für Garten Balkon usw”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Ganz schlechte Qualitätskontrolle vor dem Versenden”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Leider haben sie nicht gepasst”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis Leistung nicht okay”

Dicke7%

“Da das Material relativ dünn ist”

Materialqualität7%

“Billigstes Material, sehr dünn und dadurch instabil”

Farbe6%

“Einziges Manko: die Farbe”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Irreführende Darstellung”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Bricht sehr schnell”

Auslaufsicher4%

“Undicht”

Geruch3%

“Nach einer Woche am Balkon, war der Gestank weg”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße63%
Farbe11%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Materialqualität4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Kratzfestigkeit1%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%
Geruch1%
Wasserbeständigkeit1%