Skip to content
55

blumenübertopf xxl

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but a small market ($37K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 9Growth 77Conversion 9Competition 78Returns 99Price range 51Avg price 88Brand share 45Review moat 77Quality gap 45

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€64.98

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Great+64.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Great467.49

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€7.87–€175.34

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay78%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad€37K

€37K/yr · 79K searches

Conversion

Bad0.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

22 falling

Sellers

35

Top-5 brand share

78%

Open market

18%

  • Kreher60%
  • Greemotion5%
  • MePla5%
  • MELTOM4%
  • TESTRUT4%
  • UNUS4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€1K8%€3K12%€4K16%€6K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 51 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +64.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 7.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Top Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Stärke11%

“Top, leicht und trotzdem robust”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“entspricht der Beschreibung”

Montage/Installation7%

“Aufbau super Easy”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“das Ding hat Rollen, das macht das Handling einfacher”

Design insgesamt5%

“Schlichtes Design”

Gewicht leicht4%

“Top, leicht und trotzdem robust”

Pflanzenwachstum2%

“vollem Bewuchs.”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis16%

“Preis Leistung nicht okay”

Gesamtgröße12%

“So groß”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Entspricht leider nicht den Hersteller Bilder”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Ganz schlechte Qualitätskontrolle vor dem Versenden”

Dicke8%

“Dünnwandig”

Materialqualität6%

“Billig Plastik”

Geruch3%

“Das Plastik riecht sehr unangenehm”

Montage/Installation3%

“Folie schwer zu entfernen Zusammenbau schwierig nie wieder kaufe ich so einen schr”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Artikel an den Ecken beschädigt”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Nicht rollbar bei voller Erde”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße49%
Defekt Material/Teile17%
Farbe5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Materialqualität3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Kratzfestigkeit2%
Dünn2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt1%