Skip to content
58

bestway filterkartusche

Worth a look

Shows demand growing >1,000% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 20Growth 100Conversion 92Competition 43Returns 96Price range 64Avg price 82Brand share 26Review moat 38Quality gap 33

Growth

Incredible>1,000%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€17.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€5.35–€32.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay2,742.58

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay90%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€79K

€79K/yr · 40K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

120

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

8%

  • Bestway61%
  • Intex13%
  • Mscomft9%
  • Denkmsd4%
  • YANHUA3%
  • WuYan3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€8K20%€16K30%€24K40%€32K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 37 weeks — >1,000% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KBlack Friday '25Spike '26Oct '25Nov '25Dec '25Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße28%

“Passt”

Filterung27%

“super Wasserfilter”

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Top Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis-Leistung echt super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Macht sein job”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Langlebig”

Einfache Reinigung4%

“Reinigen gut”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Einfach”

Materialqualität1%

“Material macht einen super Eindruck – und die Größe stimmt auch”

What buyers complain about

Filterung36%

“Schlechter als Originalfilter”

Gesamtgröße29%

“Keine gute Passgenauigkeit”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Die Dinger sind generell Schrott”

Defekt Material/Teile7%

“Die Dinger sind generell Schrott”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Dazu der exorbitante Preis”

Einfache Reinigung7%

“Gute Idee, leider mit mäßigem Reinigungsergebnis”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße88%
Filterung8%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Qualität insgesamt1%
Montage/Installation0%
Haltbarkeit0%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit0%