Skip to content
57

arebos whirlpool filter

Worth a look

Shows demand growing >1,000% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 8Growth 100Conversion 79Competition 25Returns 96Price range 93Avg price 94Brand share 37Review moat 69Quality gap 30

Growth

Incredible>1,000%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€22.41

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€14.38–€35.01

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good759.89

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay83%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad70%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad€34K

€34K/yr · 19K searches

Competition

The top 5 products capture 70% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

19

Top-5 brand share

83%

Open market

14%

  • Arebos31%
  • XVOYDT19%
  • woejgo17%
  • Hrozny10%
  • GAJA5%
  • Denkmsd4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€3K20%€7K30%€10K40%€13K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 49 weeks — >1,000% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Holiday '25Spike '26Aug '25Sep '25Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße38%

“Passt”

Filterung31%

“Super Filter”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Top Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Wie beschrieben sehr zufrieden”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis-Leistung echt super”

Einfache Reinigung1%

“Top Reinigung des Whirlpools”

Stärke1%

“Solide”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße50%

“Keine gute Passgenauigkeit”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Preis zu hoch”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Qualitativ also massiv schlechter”

Filterung13%

“Schlechter als Originalfilter”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße82%
Filterung12%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Qualität insgesamt1%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Montage0%
Montage/Installation0%
Konnektivität – insgesamt0%