Skip to content
54

akku astschere

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($68.06 avg), but soft demand (-30.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 79Growth 10Conversion 26Competition 61Returns 86Price range 49Avg price 87Brand share 59Review moat 58Quality gap 43

Avg price

Great€68.06

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great€1.1M

€1.1M/yr · 772K searches

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good1,173.28

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€19.05–€183.43

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay2.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-30.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

24 falling

Sellers

199

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

27%

  • Einhell35%
  • Bosch16%
  • Gardena9%
  • Yanhama5%
  • WORX4%
  • Veitorld3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€43K8%€86K12%€129K16%€172K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 36 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -30.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
70K50KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit17%

“Einfaches Handling, super Produkt”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Super Produkt”

Akkulaufzeit13%

“Super Akku Astschere”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis / Leistung super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Hält was er verspricht”

Stärke6%

“Robust”

Griff4%

“Entlastung des Handgelenks”

Gewicht leicht4%

“angenehmes Gewicht”

Effizienz4%

“Funtioniert sehr Gut”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit14%

“Defekt nach 2 Jahren”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Qualität unzureichend”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“unhandlich”

Aufladen6%

“defekte Auflade-Elektronik”

Akkulaufzeit6%

“Akku defekt - die Schere läßt sich nicht mehr aufladen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“als Ersatz extrem teuer.”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Funktioniert überhaupt nicht gut”

Gewicht schwer4%

“Etwas schwer”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung4%

“Bedienungsanleitung unbedingt lesen”

Produktzustand3%

“Neulieferung”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt20%
Defekt Material/Teile12%
Gesamtgröße11%
Gewicht schwer9%
Stärke6%
Aufladen6%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%
Produktzustand3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%