Skip to content
58

24 mx zelt

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +186.3% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 11Growth 97Conversion 17Competition 84Returns 66Price range 41Avg price 74Brand share 31Review moat 73Quality gap 82

Growth

Incredible+186.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Great31%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€101.57

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good577.41

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Good2.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Okay€25.72–€205.01

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay86%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Bad1.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€45K

€45K/yr · 32K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (31% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 rising

Sellers

41

Top-5 brand share

86%

Open market

14%

  • COBIZI72%
  • Amflip5%
  • VOUNOT3%
  • LEADZM2%
  • Trintion2%
  • GVDV2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (17 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€9004%€2K6%€3K8%€4K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 56 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 53 weeks — +186.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KPrime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation19%

“Super leicht zum aufbauen und sehr stabil”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Beste Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis Leistung ok”

Stärke7%

“Solides Zelt”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Klasse verarbeitet auf jeden Fall Wasserdicht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Super easy”

Gewicht leicht5%

“Das Gewicht von ca. 3 Kilogramm stellt selbst für Wanderungen kein Problem dar”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Genau, was wir wollten”

Materialqualität2%

“Das Material sieht wertig aus”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Minderwertige Ware”

Gesamtgröße9%

“Das Packmaß ist klein”

Wasserbeständigkeit9%

“Nicht Wasserdicht/Wetterfest”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Falltbares - Pavillon”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Artikel passt nicht zur Beschreibung”

Stärke7%

“Leider nicht sehr robust”

Montage/Installation5%

“Aufbau nervt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Sehr schade für den Preis”

Auslaufsicher4%

“Komplett undicht”

Materialqualität3%

“Absolut schlechte material”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße24%
Defekt Material/Teile11%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Wasserbeständigkeit9%
Montage/Installation6%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Haltbarkeit3%
Materialqualität3%
Auslaufsicher2%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%