Skip to content
54

yellowstone

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +155.6% this quarter, but weak search conversion (0.0%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 8Growth 96Conversion 1Competition 64Returns 29Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 54Review moat 79Quality gap 67

Growth

Incredible+155.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Incredible€36.39

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible€16.43–€95.44

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great422.21

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Okay5.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad€31K

€31K/yr · 2.1M searches

Conversion

Bad0.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 falling

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

21%

  • Yellowstone35%
  • Y Yellowstone11%
  • Zaitun9%
  • PARAMOUNT NETWORK9%
  • Dubinik8%
  • Mr.Stream7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€2K10%€3K15%€5K20%€6K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 71 weeks — +155.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
150K100KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26MarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt34%

“Top Ware”

Gesamtgröße18%

“Größe optimal super alles wie beschrieben”

Komfort insgesamt13%

“Eine super schöne Capy sitzt super sehr bequem”

Form/Stil9%

“style ist super”

Geschenk Zweck4%

“Schönes Geschenk”

Lederqualität4%

“Die Löcher sind klein, also besser vergrößern doch sonst sehr schön und echtes Leder”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preis Leistung stimmen”

Druckqualität4%

“Prima Shirt, Aufdruck dezent”

Wärme2%

“Tolles, warmes Flanellhemd”

Verzierungs/Stickereiqualität2%

“Schön groß und hübsch verziert”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt33%

“Kein hochwertigen Erwartungen haben”

Druckqualität17%

“der Aufdruck nicht ganz mittig.”

Materialqualität8%

“Ein Punkt ist mir jedoch aufgefallen, den man vor dem Kauf wissen sollte: Der Ochsenkopf auf der Vorderseite besteht nicht aus Metall, sondern aus Kunststoff”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße59%
Farbe6%
Breite6%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Ärmelpassform3%
Druckqualität3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Länge2%
Komfort insgesamt1%
Geruch1%