Skip to content
29

weiße leggings damen blickdicht

Skip it

Soft demand (-50.9% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 9Growth 0Conversion 33Competition 45Returns 14Price range 53Avg price 43Brand share 38Review moat 22Quality gap 63

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good€6.49–€24.50

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Okay€11.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay2.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad9,743.55

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad8.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad€34K

€34K/yr · 118K searches

Growth

Bad-50.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

17

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

14%

  • adorence33%
  • TNNZEET14%
  • SINOPHANT14%
  • FuelMeFoot13%
  • Geyuwoz8%
  • Leafigure4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€3K20%€7K30%€10K40%€14K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -50.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße30%

“Passt perfekt”

Komfort insgesamt15%

“superbequem, sitzt perfekt”

Materialqualität12%

“Leichtes Material”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Sonst von der Qualität nicht so schlecht”

Weiches Gefühl5%

“super weiches Material”

Farbe5%

“Sehr gut, sehr hübsch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Für den Preis super”

Transparenz3%

“sowie absolut blickdicht – auch in Weiß ein wichtiger Pluspunkt.”

Dünn2%

“Dünne weiche Qualität”

Korrekt Inhalt2%

“Die Bestellung war korrekt”

What buyers complain about

Transparenz24%

“Durchsichtig”

Gesamtgröße13%

“fällt viel zu klein aus”

Undurchsichtig/Transparenz10%

“0,0 Blickdicht, Müll”

Farbe10%

“Weiße Leggins mit gelben Flecken”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“beide total dünn von der Qualität - wird zurück geschickt!”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren4%

“Naht nicht korrekt”

Lücke/Loch4%

“Verfärbt und Kleine Löcher”

Produktzustand4%

“Verderbte Hose”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Materialqualität4%

“Material nicht so gut”

Top return reasons

Transparenz42%
Gesamtgröße17%
Materialqualität8%
Farbe7%
Dünn5%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Länge3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Breite2%
Geruch2%