Skip to content
63

unterhosen jungen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 59Conversion 34Competition 80Returns 100Price range 71Avg price 84Brand share 61Review moat 59Quality gap 30

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€18.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great35%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good€7.28–€34.33

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Good+34.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good1,143.07

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€450K

€450K/yr · 892K searches

Conversion

Okay2.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (35% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

20 falling

Sellers

76

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

27%

  • JACK & JONES22%
  • JackLoveBriefs17%
  • FM London13%
  • PUMA12%
  • Basic Treasure5%
  • Cogindss Xmrlvn5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€14K6%€27K9%€41K12%€54K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 69 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +34.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KPrime Day '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße33%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Super Produkt”

Komfort insgesamt9%

“Bequem super”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Tolles Preis Leistungsverhältnis”

Farbe4%

“Farbecht, sehr gute Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Genau richtig”

Design insgesamt2%

“Schönes Design”

Materialqualität2%

“super softes Material”

Geeignet für Maschinenwäsche2%

“Auch nach mehrmaligem Waschen sind Passform”

Waschechtheit2%

“Waschen in Form. Kinder”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße25%

“Größen Fallen kleiner aus”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Qualität ist nicht empfehlenswert”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren10%

“Verstärkung/Naht am Imtimbereich scharfkantig und grob”

Haltbarkeit9%

“Leider nach 1x Waschen und 1x Tragen direkt kaputt”

Materialqualität5%

“aus hartem, billig wirkendem Material.”

Einfache Reinigung4%

“unbrauchbar nach 2x waschen”

Defekt Material/Teile4%

“Plastik am Stück für das Glied”

Geruch4%

“riechen SEHR nach CHEMIE.”

Dünn4%

“Dünnes Material”

Geeignet für Maschinenwäsche3%

“aber wäscht sich schnell aus.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße100%