Skip to content
57

trachten tshirt herren

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +251.3% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 99Conversion 11Competition 85Returns 2Price range 89Avg price 90Brand share 65Review moat 83Quality gap 77

Growth

Incredible+251.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great€20.91

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€12.90–€40.65

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great30%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great338.02

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€25K

€25K/yr · 136K searches

Returns

Bad11.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (30% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

22 falling

Sellers

23

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

28%

  • LOBO NEGRO19%
  • RAHMENLOS13%
  • Stockerpoint12%
  • Neverless11%
  • OS Trachten11%
  • Baddery6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€7416%€1K9%€2K12%€3K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 56 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +251.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 16.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt27%

“Gute Produkt”

Gesamtgröße23%

“Passt”

Druckqualität10%

“Top Shirt, der Aufdruck sieht und fühlt sich sehr hochwertig an”

Komfort insgesamt10%

“Super angenehm zu tragen”

Design insgesamt7%

“Top Design sehr angenehm zu tragen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Genau wie ich es mir vorgestellt habe”

Materialqualität3%

“Material fühlt sich gut und dick an, Größe fällt wirklich Groß aus”

Farbe3%

“Farbe wie beschrieben”

Schweißresistenz2%

“Es fördert stark die Schweißproduktion”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt26%

“Einfach miese Qualität”

Farbe22%

“Farbe abweichend”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Ist ja kein Billigteil”

Materialqualität11%

“Ganz seltsamer Stoffmix”

Druckqualität11%

“die Hälfte des Aufdrucks ist weg.”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Viel zu klein”

Geruch4%

“stinkt wie wie eine chinesische Plastiktütenfabrik”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße61%
Farbe6%
Materialqualität5%
Breite5%
Qualität insgesamt4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Länge2%
Schulterpassform1%
Lücke/Loch1%
Brustpassform1%