Skip to content
59

top mit integriertem bh

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 12% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 7Growth 96Conversion 4Competition 97Returns 15Price range 71Avg price 75Brand share 83Review moat 61Quality gap 80

Competition

Incredible12%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Incredible+151.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Great52%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€14.96

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€8.01–€31.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,059.39

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad8.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad€30K

€30K/yr · 661K searches

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (12% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

54 rising

Sellers

73

Top-5 brand share

52%

Open market

44%

  • Danysu13%
  • Charmo13%
  • vislivin12%
  • Aottori8%
  • STARBILD6%
  • Tomwell4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%€2972%€5933%€8904%€1K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 236 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +151.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße25%

“Passt”

Komfort insgesamt23%

“super bequem”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Produkt”

Materialqualität5%

“Angenehmes Material”

Form/Stil4%

“Beste Form”

Weiches Gefühl4%

“Das Material ist sehr weich und angenehm”

Farbe3%

“und gehe ich gleich mehrere Farben bestellen”

Brustpassform3%

“Bester trägerloser BH”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Preis Leistung prima”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Tut, was es soll”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße35%

“Unten das Shirt könnte 2-3 cm schmaler sein”

Geruch4%

“Abnormer Geruch”

Falten4%

“Bei mir schob sich der Stoff im Achselbereich hoch und warf Falten”

Farbe3%

“Farbe sofort nach erstem Waschen verblasst”

Allergien3%

“Fühlt sich nicht schön auf der Haut an”

Form/Stil3%

“Kein Shaping Effekt”

Transparenz2%

“in weiß ist das Top eher durchsichtig.”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Falsche Beschreibung”

Taillenpassform2%

“sehr auf Taille genäht, dafür so lang, dass es weit über den Po geht -bei 170 cm Körpergröße.”

Komfort insgesamt2%

“Keine angenehme Passform”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße48%
Breite9%
Länge7%
Brustpassform6%
Materialqualität4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Farbe3%
Transparenz2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Taillenpassform1%