Skip to content
47

sexy oberteil damen

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.2%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 6Growth 15Conversion 3Competition 97Returns 14Price range 64Avg price 64Brand share 96Review moat 66Quality gap 81

Competition

Incredible11%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Incredible31%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good857.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good€13.64

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€7.35–€28.33

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-20.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Bad8.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad€24K

€24K/yr · 851K searches

Conversion

Bad0.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (11% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

88 falling

Sellers

134

Top-5 brand share

31%

Open market

65%

  • Cuptacc9%
  • Aottori7%
  • Avidlove7%
  • GORGLITTER5%
  • Amazon Essentials4%
  • NONSAR3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%€2442%€4883%€7324%€9751101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 267 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -20.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße29%

“Passt mega”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Super Qualität”

Komfort insgesamt11%

“Bequemes sexy Top”

Materialqualität7%

“Material super”

Farbe6%

“Ich werde mir das Top gerne in anderen Farben kaufen”

Weiches Gefühl4%

“Material super weich”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preis Leistung OK”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Wie auf dem Foto”

Form/Stil3%

“Elegant”

Waschechtheit2%

“gut zu waschen”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße36%

“Shirt long”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“but bad quality”

Dicke4%

“man merkt, dass es nicht das dickste Material ist.”

Materialqualität3%

“Billiges Material”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren3%

“Schlechte Qualität, löst sich trotz niedriger Waschtemperatur an den Nähten auf”

Länge3%

“passt wie beschrieben bis auf‘s Detail dass es kürzer ist wie auf den Bildern.”

Ärmelpassform3%

“hatte erst Bedenken,daß die Ärmel zu lang sind”

Geruch2%

“kein Hemd was nach Billigplastik stinkt!”

Farbe2%

“Allerdings ist der Druck nach dem ersten Waschen plötzlich gelb”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Sah nicht wie Abbildung”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße46%
Materialqualität9%
Länge8%
Breite8%
Farbe5%
Qualität insgesamt4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Ärmelpassform2%
Transparenz2%
Lücke/Loch1%