Skip to content
55

schuhlöffel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but soft demand (-25.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 82Growth 12Conversion 90Competition 55Returns 98Price range 29Avg price 29Brand share 56Review moat 34Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.3M

€1.3M/yr · 1.2M searches

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good52%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,124.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay€9.54

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay€3.90–€19.44

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-25.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 52% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

49

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

23%

  • WALKINGLINE23%
  • ZOMAKE19%
  • IKEA18%
  • YiPHomn6%
  • Die Schuhanzieher5%
  • HAIX5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€64K10%€127K15%€191K20%€254K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -25.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Stärke29%

“Robust”

Qualität insgesamt25%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Produkt wie abgebildet”

Länge5%

“Lang, stabil, optimal, Schuhe anziehen ohne sich zu bücken”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Gut und günstig”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Super Handhabung”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Schweres, robustes Teil aus stabilem Metall, für die Ewigkeit”

Komfort insgesamt2%

“Bequemlichkeit”

Design insgesamt2%

“- Schlichtes, modernes Design”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Defekte Ware, schlechte Qualität, kein Kunden-Support”

Haltbarkeit14%

“Hält überhaupt nicht”

Materialqualität12%

“Dünnes Material”

Stärke9%

“Das Metall ist viel zu dünn”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Länge Mittelgroß”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Und im Vergleich ist ein Schuhanzieher aus Metall nur unwesentlich teuer”

Flexibilität5%

“Verbiegt leicht”

Dünn2%

“Das Material ist so dünn”

Hartes Gefühl2%

“Allerdings sehr hart”

Farbe1%

“die schwarze Farbe abgeblättert.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße30%
Gewicht schwer12%
Qualität insgesamt7%
Länge7%
Materialqualität6%
Haltbarkeit6%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Schärfe3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Flexibilität3%