Skip to content
54

schuheinlagen schweißfüße

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but a deep review moat (8,633 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 74Growth 24Conversion 48Competition 69Returns 96Price range 41Avg price 49Brand share 25Review moat 22Quality gap 68

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Good€826K

€826K/yr · 1.8M searches

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay€11.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Okay3.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay€4.04–€22.60

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay90%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-1.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad8,632.76

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

7%

  • Dr. Scholl's46%
  • SULPO24%
  • VALSOLE10%
  • smart&gentle6%
  • Akusoli4%
  • FootMaster3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€41K10%€83K15%€124K20%€165K1001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 41 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KSpike '24Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Komfort insgesamt31%

“Superbequem”

Gesamtgröße14%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Preis Leistung OK”

Weiches Gefühl5%

“angenehm weich”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Das das Produkt genau das macht, was es soll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“also einfach”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt3%

“Spürbare Erleichterung für die Füße”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Gute Klebkraft und mit 0,7mm Dicke für mich optimal”

Kissen2%

“Qualitativ hochwertig und sehr bequem die Polsterung ist sehr angenehm”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße12%

“passt nicht”

Haltbarkeit11%

“Schlechte Haltbarkeit”

Komfort insgesamt7%

“Unbequem”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt7%

“Schmerzhaft”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Überteuerter Schrott”

Funktionalität insgesamt5%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%

“Kleber hält kaum”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Hält nicht was er verspricht”

Geruch3%

“Stinkt”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße55%
Komfort insgesamt8%
Füße fit4%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Hartes Gefühl3%
Dicke2%
Weiches Gefühl2%
Dünn2%