Skip to content
50

rutschfeste

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 17% of clicks), but high returns (14.1%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 12Growth 79Conversion 19Competition 96Returns 0Price range 65Avg price 76Brand share 40Review moat 21Quality gap 76

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Great+70.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€15.45

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€6.56–€30.37

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad10,816.97

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Bad1.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€50K

€50K/yr · 210K searches

Returns

Bad14.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

27 rising

Sellers

213

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

16%

  • PUMA30%
  • adidas29%
  • FILA11%
  • Kubota5%
  • Calish5%
  • SCHLAPPY3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (21 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€9944%€2K6%€3K8%€4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 127 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Komfort insgesamt26%

“Bequeme Badeschuhe”

Gesamtgröße25%

“Passen super”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Super Qualität”

Farbe6%

“Farbe wie abgebildet”

Weiches Gefühl3%

“Soft, angenehmes Fußbett und schöne Farben”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“fairer Preis”

Form/Stil2%

“sie sehen auch modern aus.”

Gewicht leicht2%

“trägt sich leicht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Erfüllt seinen Zweck”

Materialqualität1%

“Material ist ok”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße58%

“Grösse”

Komfort insgesamt5%

“Unbequem”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Fühlen sich ein wenig weniger wertig an als die Klassiker mit den Streifen”

Füße fit3%

“Schmaler Fuß”

Geruch2%

“stinken deshalb gleich zurück, sind die wirklich von Puma”

Materialqualität2%

“Das Material ist relativ hart”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Defekt nach dem ersten Mal tragen”

Hartes Gefühl1%

“Zu weich, zu weit”

Form/Stil1%

“Schmale Ausführung”

Produktzustand1%

“Benutzt”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße64%
Füße fit12%
Breite9%
Komfort insgesamt3%
Länge3%
Farbe2%
Materialqualität1%
Qualität insgesamt1%
Hartes Gefühl1%
Geruch1%