Skip to content
36

regenponcho durchsichtig kinder

Skip it

Soft demand (-99.1% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 9Growth 0Conversion 96Competition 24Returns 69Price range 0Avg price 22Brand share 30Review moat 64Quality gap 73

Conversion

Incredible13.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Good2.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good944.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad71%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Avg price

Bad€7.90

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad€36K

€36K/yr · 33K searches

Growth

Bad-99.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad€4.34–€10.25

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 71% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

8 rising

Sellers

11

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

8%

  • Opret27%
  • SWOGAA24%
  • Vicloon16%
  • TUNCHMO12%
  • Cosowe8%
  • Igoera5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€2K10%€4K15%€5K20%€7K1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 10 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 19 weeks — -99.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
150100Spike '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wasserbeständigkeit17%

“Halten Regen gut ab”

Gesamtgröße14%

“ideal zum Mitnehmen (weil so klein”

Feucht/Trocken10%

“Trocken geblieben”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis-Leistung super”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Qualität ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Tut was es soll”

schnelltrocknend6%

“Alles blieb trocken”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Wiederverwendbar 👌 durch die Knöpfe leicht anzuziehen.”

Materialqualität3%

“Das Material ist gut”

Haltbarkeit2%

“hält super”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße14%

“leider zu klein”

Haltbarkeit14%

“Leider schnell gerissen”

Dicke13%

“Dünn”

Ärmelpassform9%

“Keine Ärmel”

Steifheit5%

“Es ist etwas steif”

Armpassform3%

“leider sind die arme was kurz.”

Materialqualität2%

“Das Material ist wirklich sehr dünn”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße59%
Qualität insgesamt11%
Dünn8%
Länge6%
Transparenz3%
Geruch3%
Nähen/Finish/Polieren2%
Eignung Feuchtes Wetter2%
Lücke/Loch2%
Armpassform2%