Skip to content
36

pokemon legenden z-a switch

Skip it

Soft demand (-52.1% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 55Growth 0Conversion 53Competition 0Returns 98Price range 26Avg price 62Brand share 0Review moat 56Quality gap 58

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Good€13.49

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,240.67

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€393K

€393K/yr · 663K searches

Conversion

Good4.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay€10.84–€16.47

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-52.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

2 falling

Sellers

7

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Pokémon75%
  • HEART FOR CARDS25%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%€59K30%€118K45%€177K60%€236K1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 3 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 82 weeks — -52.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 40.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Sammlungsobjekte33%

“Sehr schöne Pokemonkarten”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Alles wie erwartet”

Geschenk Zweck12%

“Als Geschenk für Kinder aber sicher cool”

Design insgesamt10%

“Schönes Design”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“2–3 € = guter Deal”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Super qualitativ hochwertige Spielkarten”

Helligkeit/Glanz/Glühen7%

“Es glitzert”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Hat so ziemlich gepasst”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis75%

“Preis unangebracht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt19%

“Hier wird mit falschen Versprechungen gelockt”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Mir wurde gesagt, dass die Karten nicht wirklich gut sind”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt44%
Gesamtgröße21%
Qualität insgesamt13%
Reißverschlussqualität8%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%
Dünn4%
Helligkeit/Glanz/Glühen4%