Skip to content
39

minecraft adventskalender 2022

Skip it

Soft demand (-60.5% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 13Growth 0Conversion 7Competition 89Returns 79Price range 87Avg price 94Brand share 8Review moat 46Quality gap 27

Avg price

Great€22.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great26%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great€11.74–€46.18

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Great1.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Okay1,852.97

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad€50K

€50K/yr · 428K searches

Brand share

Bad97%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-60.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (26% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

8 rising

Sellers

85

Top-5 brand share

97%

Open market

2%

  • Minecraft84%
  • LEGO6%
  • NAME IT2%
  • Paladone2%
  • NEXT2%
  • Shirtracer2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€1K4%€2K6%€3K8%€4K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 75 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -60.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 176.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Super gemacht”

Gesamtgröße19%

“Passt perfekt”

Geschenk Zweck12%

“Schönes Geschenk”

Helligkeit/Glanz/Glühen9%

“Schöne Lampe”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Für den Preis echt super”

Wärme6%

“Sehr flauschig und warm”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Wie abgebildet geliefert”

Materialqualität3%

“Material top”

Farbe3%

“Super Farbe”

Effizienz2%

“es funktioniert einwandfrei”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Qualität nicht ausreichend”

Gesamtgröße23%

“Fällt klein aus”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis18%

“unbezahlbar”

Materialqualität9%

“Material reißt zu leicht”

Geräuschpegel6%

“Würfel macht beim Drücken Geräusche”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Lampe funktioniert nicht”

Stärke3%

“Die Lampe ist schon so primitiv aus dünnem Kunststoff”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße52%
Reißverschlussqualität9%
Funktionalität insgesamt5%
Breite4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Materialqualität3%
Ärmelpassform3%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Kratzfestigkeit2%
Geschenk Zweck1%