Skip to content
48

leo rock

Skip it

Soft demand (-43.0% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 7Growth 3Conversion 5Competition 96Returns 23Price range 83Avg price 94Brand share 82Review moat 65Quality gap 94

Competition

Incredible18%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€22.68

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€5.83–€65.96

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great53%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Good916.31

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad6.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad€28K

€28K/yr · 299K searches

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-43.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (18% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

52 rising

Sellers

81

Top-5 brand share

53%

Open market

43%

  • GORGLITTER33%
  • SOLY HUX8%
  • SASSYCLASSY4%
  • keland4%
  • SHEKINI4%
  • Zwillingsherz4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€5554%€1K6%€2K8%€2K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)11 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 134 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 97 weeks — -43.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Komfort insgesamt25%

“elegant kombinierbar und angenehm zu tragen”

Gesamtgröße23%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Super Qualität”

Materialqualität6%

“angenehmes Material”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Weiches Gefühl5%

“super weiches angenehmes Material”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Sah aber so nett auf den Fotos aus, dass ich dachte ich würde ihn auch so tragen können”

Form/Stil2%

“super shape”

Gewicht leicht2%

“Mega schöne leichte Sommerhose”

Transparenz1%

“Sitzt super und wird auch beim bewegen nicht transparent”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße21%

“Größe oversize”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“mangelnde Qualität”

Komfort insgesamt6%

“Stoff unangenehm und reines Plastikgefühl”

Transparenz5%

“Durchsichtig”

Materialqualität4%

“Billiges Material”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Angebot sah anders aus”

Länge2%

“sind sehr Lang für meine Größe 162”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“definitiv keine 30€ wert”

Dicke2%

“Außerdem super dünn”

Farbe2%

“Hose ist gelb, nicht braun”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße26%
Materialqualität14%
Transparenz8%
Länge8%
Farbe6%
Dünn6%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Lücke/Loch4%
Breite4%
Geruch2%