Skip to content
52

gucci sonnenbrille herren

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($77.75 avg), but a small market ($40K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 10Growth 71Conversion 14Competition 81Returns 32Price range 39Avg price 83Brand share 58Review moat 75Quality gap 72

Avg price

Great€77.75

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great493.17

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+53.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Okay€14.53–€232.10

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Okay5.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€40K

€40K/yr · 46K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

22 rising

Sellers

52

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

25%

  • Gucci31%
  • Boss16%
  • Carrera10%
  • Lacoste8%
  • SHEEN KELLY5%
  • Calvin Klein Jeans5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€1K6%€2K9%€4K12%€5K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 54 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +53.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KHoliday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt24%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis21%

“Preislich gut”

Gesamtgröße19%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Genau so wie beschrieben:)”

Form/Stil6%

“Schlicht, elegant und stylisch zugleich”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“Super angenehm und setzt sehr gut”

Gewicht leicht3%

“Sehr leicht und schön zum tragen”

Stärke3%

“Fühlt sich stabil an”

Geschenk Zweck3%

“War ein Geschenk für meinen Mann”

Design insgesamt2%

“Coole Brille und Design”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt39%

“Plastikschrott”

Gesamtgröße16%

“Zu gross”

Haltbarkeit10%

“Defekt nach kurzer Zeit”

Stärke8%

“0 stabil”

Dicke5%

“Dünner rahmen”

Farbe5%

“Schon Farbe weg”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Zu teuer”

Schutz3%

“UV Schutz Schlecht”

Umweltfreundlichkeit3%

“Nicht Nachhaltig”

Kratzfestigkeit1%

“Brillenglas ist zerkratzt”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße63%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Breite5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Farbe3%
Materialqualität2%
Form/Stil2%
Produktzustand2%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%