Skip to content
27

gryffindor schal

Skip it

Soft demand (-86.7% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 3Growth 0Conversion 27Competition 22Returns 49Price range 79Avg price 86Brand share 5Review moat 53Quality gap 38

Avg price

Great€19.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€6.75–€49.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,392.92

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay3.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay2.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Bad73%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad98%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Market size

Bad€11K

€11K/yr · 25K searches

Growth

Bad-86.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 73% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 flat

Sellers

45

Top-5 brand share

98%

Open market

0%

  • Harry Potter38%
  • Cinereplicas26%
  • Funidelia22%
  • Rubie's9%
  • Seaehey3%
  • Elbenwald2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€1K20%€2K30%€3K40%€4K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -86.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 17.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt55%

“Super Qualität”

Geschenk Zweck12%

“Tolles Geschenk”

Weiches Gefühl9%

“Schöner, weicher Schal”

Wärme8%

“Passt für und hält warm”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt bei Größe 135/140 perfekt”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren3%

“Wappen ist ordentlich vernäht”

Materialqualität1%

“das Material fühlt sich angenehm an.”

Farbe1%

“Die Farben sind kräftig”

Design insgesamt1%

“Schönes Design – perfekt für Fans”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt25%

“Schlechte Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis20%

“Ein Punkt Abzug weils doch recht teuer ist”

Gesamtgröße10%

“nur die Handschuhe sind etwas groß für Kinder.”

Produktzustand5%

“Leider ein Reinfall”

Dicke5%

“Er könnte etwas dicker sein”

Geruch5%

“Da der Schal etwas chemisch roch, wurde er in der Maschine kurz durchgewaschen”

Materialqualität5%

“Das Material des Schals ist dünn und nicht weich”

Top return reasons

Qualität insgesamt27%
Gesamtgröße25%
Farbe16%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%
Länge5%
Nähen/Finish/Polieren4%
Materialqualität3%
Lücke/Loch3%
Haltbarkeit2%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit2%