Skip to content
48

funktionsunterhemd herren

Skip it

Soft demand (-29.2% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 30Growth 10Conversion 19Competition 96Returns 19Price range 87Avg price 91Brand share 61Review moat 52Quality gap 67

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€21.58

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.46–€74.54

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good1,403.99

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay€134K

€134K/yr · 408K searches

Conversion

Bad1.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad7.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-29.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

29 rising

Sellers

211

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

28%

  • Odlo43%
  • GripGrab7%
  • AMZSPORT7%
  • Runhit6%
  • Nepest5%
  • INBIKE4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€3K4%€5K6%€8K8%€11K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 123 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 62 weeks — -29.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KPrime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße22%

“Passt perfekt”

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Beste Qualität”

Komfort insgesamt12%

“Sehr angenehm auf der Haut”

Übung/Sporteignung8%

“Super für den Sport”

Wärme5%

“Aber hält gut warm, am kalten lauftagen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Wie erwartet”

Materialqualität4%

“Funktionales Material”

Atmungsaktivität4%

“Also gute Ventilation”

schnelltrocknend3%

“erfüllen anhand der schnellen Trocknung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“Super Produkt zum fairen Preis”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße34%

“Fällt klein aus”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Teuer”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Preis leistung nicht so ok”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren3%

“Ein paar Nähte sind bereits geplatzt”

Transparenz3%

“Tolles Compression Tshirt, leider durchsichtig”

Dicke2%

“Dünner Stoff”

Materialqualität2%

“Sehr dünnes Material”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Größen sind irreführend”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Bund beginnt zu Rollen”

Waschechtheit2%

“Funktionsweise wurde nach 5 mal waschen entsorgt”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße64%
Dünn5%
Materialqualität5%
Transparenz3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Produktzustand2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Wärme2%
Farbe2%
Länge2%