Skip to content
56

eistee sirup

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 63Growth 9Conversion 83Competition 85Returns 100Price range 31Avg price 93Brand share 5Review moat 90Quality gap 33

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€51.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great194.42

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great30%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Conversion

Great9.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good€576K

€576K/yr · 124K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay€1.49–€275.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-32.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad98%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (30% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

98%

Open market

1%

  • Pfanner86%
  • Pure Tea7%
  • Pfanner Schutzbekleidung3%
  • bobalife1%
  • Ratioparts1%
  • SWS Forst GmbH1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 1%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€23K8%€46K12%€69K16%€92K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 53 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -32.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt49%

“Schmeckt Super”

Geschmack12%

“Super Geschmack”

Süße8%

“Zero Zucker mit vollem Pfanner Geschmack wer Eistee mag ist hier richtig”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“SUPER Preis-Leistung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Frische1%

“warm erfrischend”

Alkoholgeschmack1%

“Das beste Fon Apfelsaft, was ich kenne”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt1%

“Super leckerer hochwertiger Premium Saft mit 25% Pfirsichmark”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Passt”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt32%

“Schmeckt nicht so gut”

Künstliche Süßstoffe10%

“Angeblich Zero, ist trotzdem Zucker drin:(”

Geschmack10%

“Geschmacklich nicht gut”

Süße8%

“Lecker, könnte aber noch weniger Zucker drin sein”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“könnte billiger sein”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Die Packung ist für mich etwas zu groß”

Verdünnt/wässrig2%

“Wässrig”

Allergien2%

“Ziemlich ätzend im Hals und auch im Magen,”

Geruch2%

“es riecht extrem muffig”

Bitter2%

“Bitter”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße69%
Taillenpassform8%
Länge5%
Farbe5%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%
Materialqualität3%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Brustpassform3%
Füße fit3%