Skip to content
57

diabetikersocken herren

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 61Growth 23Conversion 50Competition 83Returns 93Price range 47Avg price 78Brand share 40Review moat 45Quality gap 52

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great32%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€16.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€531K

€531K/yr · 826K searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay4.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay€6.97–€22.18

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay1,979.62

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-3.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (32% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

23

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

17%

  • sockenkauf2461%
  • SockWaddles8%
  • Jeasona6%
  • Occulto3%
  • ZFSOCK3%
  • TUUHAW3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (12 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€11K4%€21K6%€32K8%€42K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 73 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Komfort insgesamt26%

“Comfort Socken”

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Super Qualität”

Gesamtgröße17%

“Passt”

Weiches Gefühl7%

“Ganz soft”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Preis Leistung ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Macht was es soll”

Materialqualität3%

“Angenehmes Material”

Farbe2%

“Schönes Jeans-Blau”

Schwellung2%

“Ideal bei geschwollenen Beinen, Sehr gute Qualität, funktionieren wie beschrieben, rasche Lieferung und sehr zu empfehlen”

Dehnbarkeit/Erweiterbarkeit/Elastizität1%

“sind dehnbar”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße13%

“Socken fallen kleiner aus”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Qualität gleich null”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Bin skeptisch bzgl Langlebigkeit”

Lücke/Loch7%

“Zwei Löcher in Socke”

Dünn4%

“Material zu dünn”

Materialqualität3%

“Material zu dünn”

Geeignet für Maschinenwäsche3%

“Eingegangen nach 4 X Waschen”

Dicke2%

“Zudem ist das Material recht dünn – zwar angenehm für wärmere Tage,”

Schwellung2%

“Socken wurden gekauft, da nach einer Knie-OP das Bein sehr stark geschwollen war”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Verbrauchertäuschung”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße33%
Dünn10%
Füße fit8%
Breite7%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Materialqualität5%
Länge5%
Brustpassform3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Taillenpassform3%