Skip to content
56

brosche

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 27% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 15Growth 16Conversion 15Competition 94Returns 88Price range 76Avg price 20Brand share 97Review moat 96Quality gap 76

Brand share

Incredible27%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Incredible71.62

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great21%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great€4.16–€50.02

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Bad€7.25

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-17.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€62K

€62K/yr · 705K searches

Conversion

Bad1.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (21% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

65 falling

Sellers

78

Top-5 brand share

27%

Open market

69%

  • Ouligay7%
  • Yolev6%
  • Momeski6%
  • CHarmeFleur4%
  • Tucnoeu4%
  • Bikasun4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€1K4%€2K6%€4K8%€5K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 84 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -17.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt24%

“Super Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Preis Leistung super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“BROCHE WIE ABGEBILDET”

Form/Stil10%

“Elegant”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Handhabung einfach und praktisch”

Farbe6%

“Brosche grün”

Design insgesamt5%

“Sieht wirklich elegant aus”

Geschenk Zweck5%

“Super Geschenkidee”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passt”

Stärke2%

“auch recht robust.”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße17%

“Sehr klein”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Schlechte Verarbeitung im Detail”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Anzahl Angaben nicht korrekt”

Dicke9%

“Magnetkraft reicht definitiv nicht für etwas dickere Stoffe”

Farbe7%

“brosche ist wegen der farbe ein bisschen auffallend -”

Defekt Material/Teile7%

“Ein Teil schon kaputt”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Aber sie halten garnicht gut”

Nicht nachhaltiges Design4%

“Schlecht Verarbeitet”

Knoten-/Fadenqualität4%

“Ärgerlich ist die schlechte Verarbeitung, überall erstmal die losen Fäden abschneiden müssen”

Gewicht schwer2%

“Etwas schwerer als erwartet”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße47%
Qualität insgesamt11%
Farbe5%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Materialqualität4%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
Gewicht schwer2%
Dicke2%
Lücke/Loch2%