Skip to content
53

body damen

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 19% of clicks), but weak search conversion (0.5%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 21Conversion 6Competition 95Returns 6Price range 73Avg price 80Brand share 58Review moat 71Quality gap 92

Competition

Incredible19%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€17.06

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€7.32–€35.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good650.3

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good€363K

€363K/yr · 4.6M searches

Growth

Bad-8.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad10.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (19% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

35 falling

Sellers

59

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

25%

  • creamy fabrics22%
  • SHAPERX17%
  • Joyshaper12%
  • YADIFEN12%
  • Breampot8%
  • SIMIYA5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€7K4%€15K6%€22K8%€29K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 130 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -8.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
90K70KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße31%

“Super Hose super Passform”

Komfort insgesamt23%

“Bequem und sexy”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Super Produkt”

Materialqualität5%

“Angenehm vom Material”

Form/Stil5%

“Shape”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Shaping zum fairen Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Genau wie auf den Fotos”

Weiches Gefühl2%

“Das Material ist angenehm weich”

Dehnbarkeit/Erweiterbarkeit/Elastizität2%

“trotz sehr guter Spannkraft”

Farbe1%

“Werde mir noch eine andere Farbe kaufen”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße35%

“Fällt klein aus”

Form/Stil9%

“kaum Shape Effekt.”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Absoluter Müll”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“Unbequem”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren2%

“Leider lösen sich die Nähte nach wenigem Tragen auf”

Lücke/Loch2%

“Loch”

Geeignet für Maschinenwäsche2%

“Vom Tragen sehr schön jedoch nach dem 2 mal waschen kaputt gegangen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Leider unbrauchbar”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Nach 3 Mal ist Schluss”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße56%
Breite8%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
Form/Stil4%
Länge4%
Materialqualität3%
Komfort insgesamt2%
Brustpassform2%
Lücke/Loch2%
Qualität insgesamt2%