Skip to content
56

bandeau top damen

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +195.5% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 97Conversion 6Competition 96Returns 20Price range 49Avg price 50Brand share 82Review moat 37Quality gap 86

Growth

Incredible+195.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Incredible18%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Great53%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Good€12.04

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay€5.54–€24.26

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,777

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad7.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad€22K

€22K/yr · 416K searches

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (18% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

32 falling

Sellers

41

Top-5 brand share

53%

Open market

41%

  • Gosunny18%
  • ONEW12%
  • Tomwell9%
  • ZAAYO8%
  • IWOLLENCE7%
  • Geyoga6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€4414%€8826%€1K8%€2K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 116 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +195.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße25%

“Passt perfekt”

Komfort insgesamt18%

“super bequem”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Gemäss Beschreibung”

Materialqualität4%

“Das Material ist angenehm weich”

Weiches Gefühl4%

“Das Material ist weich”

Brustpassform4%

“Bester trägerloser BH”

Form/Stil4%

“Form”

Stärke3%

“dennoch robust.”

Haltbarkeit3%

“und trotzdem hält”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße26%

“Passform passt nicht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Irreführende Produktbeschreibung”

Transparenz11%

“Sehr durchsichtig, schade, ansonsten genau die Farben wie angegeben”

Schulterpassform5%

“Schulterfreies top”

Materialqualität4%

“Kein schönes Material”

Dünn4%

“Sehr dünnes material”

Geruch4%

“stinkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Gut aber doch zu teuer”

Lücke/Loch1%

“Viele meiner anderen Shirts bekommen mit der Zeit kleine Löcher oder verlieren die Form”

Kissen1%

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße51%
Breite10%
Brustpassform4%
Länge4%
Materialqualität3%
Transparenz3%
Farbe3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Komfort insgesamt2%
Dünn2%