Skip to content
50

badehose jungen

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +93.8% this quarter, but high returns (9.2%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 45Growth 89Conversion 18Competition 62Returns 12Price range 41Avg price 56Brand share 61Review moat 77Quality gap 27

Growth

Great+93.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Great457

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Good€12.73

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Okay€243K

€243K/yr · 1.3M searches

Price range

Okay€7.32–€20.34

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad1.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad9.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

58

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

26%

  • maamgic37%
  • MEILONGER9%
  • RIPT8%
  • BliBliTaTa8%
  • Hill & Sea7%
  • Aisyee6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€24K20%€49K30%€73K40%€97K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +93.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße36%

“passt perfekt”

Komfort insgesamt25%

“coole Optik, bequem und schnell trocken”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Auch die Qualität überzeugt: Die Hose ist hochwertig verarbeitet”

schnelltrocknend6%

“coole Optik, bequem und schnell trocken”

Materialqualität6%

“Super Material”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“So wie abgebildet”

Farbe5%

“Farblich schön”

Gewicht leicht2%

“Schön leicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“Preis/Leistung stimmt”

Wasserbeständigkeit1%

“spielen im Wasser gut”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße41%

“Zu klein ausgefallen”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Mangelnde Qualität”

Farbe11%

“Und da mein Sohn bisher nur blaue oder andere Badehosen hatte, hat mich das sehr erschüttert”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Leider sind die Ösen der Bänder innerhalb von zwei Monaten durchgerissen”

Breite6%

“etwas eng geschnitten, ist nicht Blick dicht”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße79%
Länge6%
Breite4%
Farbe2%
Komfort insgesamt1%
Materialqualität1%
Qualität insgesamt1%
Oberschenkel fit1%
Taillenpassform1%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%