Skip to content
51

80er jahre outfit damen

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 27% of clicks), but soft demand (-46.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 51Growth 2Conversion 9Competition 88Returns 32Price range 60Avg price 85Brand share 76Review moat 43Quality gap 84

Competition

Great27%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€19.05

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Great59%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Good€4.11–€31.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€307K

€307K/yr · 2.3M searches

Review moat

Okay2,173.38

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay5.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-46.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (27% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

44 falling

Sellers

65

Top-5 brand share

59%

Open market

37%

  • UOUA30%
  • WILDPARTY10%
  • FASCHINFEVER8%
  • Lonya6%
  • ELFIN6%
  • Funnity4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€6K4%€12K6%€18K8%€25K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 95 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -46.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
120K80KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Komfort insgesamt22%

“Super bequeme Hose”

Gesamtgröße22%

“passt”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Ware”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Preis/Leistung super”

Materialqualität6%

“Material ist top”

Weiches Gefühl5%

“Sie sitzen super und sind unglaublich soft”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Besser als erwartet”

Form/Stil2%

“super shape”

Farbe2%

“Super knallig Neon”

Design insgesamt1%

“Cooles Design, gute Verarbeitung”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße22%

“Die Armbänder sind sehr klein”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Die Qualität ist nicht die beste”

Materialqualität5%

“Unangenehmes Material”

Transparenz5%

“Durchsichtig”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“Unangenehmes Material”

Dicke4%

“Außerdem super dünn”

Farbe3%

“und die Farben passen nicht zusammen, jedes Pink ist anders”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Die Ohrringe lösten sich nach kurzer Zeit auf”

Lücke/Loch2%

“Löcher”

Design insgesamt1%

“Ich finde, dass es Schlechte Verarbeitung ist”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße46%
Materialqualität9%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Farbe6%
Transparenz5%
Dünn4%
Länge3%
Lücke/Loch3%
Geruch2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%