Skip to content
58

zigarettenhülsen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 46Growth 23Conversion 59Competition 59Returns 98Price range 81Avg price 79Brand share 34Review moat 79Quality gap 78

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€6.26–€56.86

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great428.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great€16.53

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€247K

€247K/yr · 295K searches

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-4.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

12%

  • Gizeh48%
  • HUZAR18%
  • OCB10%
  • Philip Morris5%
  • Dark Horse4%
  • Fresh Bomb3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 12%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€10K8%€20K12%€30K16%€39K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 32 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Solide Standard-Hülsen für den Alltag”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis22%

“Preis/Leistung aber ok”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Passt”

Stärke6%

“Solide Hülsen, bequem geliefert”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“siehe Fotos.”

Filterung5%

“Super Filter”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Brauchbar,”

Design insgesamt4%

“Das Design der Pappkartons ist gleichzeitig schlicht und trotzdem auffallend”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Geht nicht kaputt”

Effizienz2%

“Sie erfüllen ihren Zweck”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis20%

“zu teuer im Vergleich”

Filterung15%

“Filter”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“komisch,der preis ist nicht gerechtfertigt viel zu teuer für die Qualität.”

Geschmack6%

“Schlechter Geschmack”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Keine guten Hülsen, oft kaputt”

Gesamtgröße4%

“der Schaft dadurch kürzer.”

Dicke3%

“Papierhülse etwas dünn”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Nicht für 100er Zigaretten, wie in Beschreibung”

Geschmack insgesamt3%

“Geschmacks hülsen”

Entflammbar3%

“Verbrennen in der Glut”

Top return reasons

Filterung18%
Defekt Material/Teile15%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%
Gesamtgröße11%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Produktzustand4%
Geruch4%
Farbe4%
Dünn4%