Skip to content
55

wasserdichte tasche schwimmen

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +160.3% this quarter, but a small market ($24K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 96Conversion 27Competition 65Returns 66Price range 65Avg price 50Brand share 74Review moat 33Quality gap 58

Growth

Incredible+160.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good2.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good€2.70–€37.77

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€11.94

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Okay3,161.24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay2.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€24K

€24K/yr · 95K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

22 falling

Sellers

61

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

31%

  • wonsar17%
  • Nordlight13%
  • ivoler12%
  • Naturehike10%
  • ECHTPower9%
  • Lamicall8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€9638%€2K12%€3K16%€4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 41 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +160.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wasserbeständigkeit27%

“Top-Dry Bag – wasserdicht, robust und vielseitig einsetzbar”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt19%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Qualität”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Praktisch, zuverlässig, elegant”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Guter Preis”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Taschen/Abteilungen4%

“Tolle Taschen”

Design insgesamt3%

“elegant”

Portabilität2%

“praktische Tasche”

Speicherkapazität2%

“Bietet genug Platz für Handy”

What buyers complain about

Wasserbeständigkeit27%

“Handyhülle nicht wasserdicht”

Geruch14%

“Starker Plaste Geruch”

Feucht/Trocken6%

“Das Papier war danach nass”

Materialqualität5%

“Das Material ist nicht sonderlich hochwertig”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren4%

“Leider halten die Nähte nicht lange”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“unhandlich”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“und den ersten Badewannentest hat er leider nicht bestanden 🫣 auch nicht wenn man vier mal um den harten Streifen wickelt.”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Zu klein”

Auslaufsicher2%

“Drybag undicht – Wasser eingedrungen, iPhone zerstört”

Haltbarkeit2%

“vermute der hält nicht lange.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße55%
Wasserbeständigkeit9%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Geruch4%
Gewicht schwer3%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Reißverschlussqualität2%
Materialqualität2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%