Skip to content
54

verdampferkopf

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 96% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 29Growth 20Conversion 43Competition 71Returns 100Price range 82Avg price 93Brand share 10Review moat 76Quality gap 81

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€22.24

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.10–€50.03

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great483.72

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay3.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay€129K

€129K/yr · 169K searches

Growth

Bad-9.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

39

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

3%

  • aspire83%
  • GOBAR5%
  • Vapefly3%
  • GeekVape2%
  • V-MOD2%
  • Vaporesso1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 3%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€5K8%€10K12%€16K16%€21K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)4 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 46 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Holiday '24SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt18%

“Halten was sie versprechen”

Gesamtgröße18%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Gute Coils, einfache Handhabung”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit12%

“sehr schnell bedienbar”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Unschlagbar niedriger Preis”

Effizienz4%

“Funktioniert”

Auslaufsicher4%

“sifft absolut nichts mehr.”

Stärke4%

“Sehr soliden mtl dampfen”

Zufriedenheit/Vergnügen2%

“Also zufriedenstellend”

Geschmack2%

“Super Geschmack”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit26%

“Haltbarkeit schwankt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Nicht mal 1 Cent Wert”

Verbrannt/geröstet/überbacken8%

“schmeckte trotz Wartezeit wie notwendig einfach verbrannt”

Defekt Material/Teile8%

“Es 4 vom 5 wahren defekt nach 5 minuten branten durch”

Entflammbar8%

“gebrannt”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“schmeckte trotz Wartezeit wie notwendig einfach verbrannt”

Aufladen6%

“Nach 5-10 Ladezyklen ist der Akku bereits defekt”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Totaler Müll”

Verschwendung natürlicher Ressourcen4%

“Ausfall”

Auslaufsicher4%

“Undicht wie der Vorgänger”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße30%
Funktionalität insgesamt14%
Auslaufsicher9%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt7%
Defekt Material/Teile7%
Aufladen5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Akkulaufzeit3%
Haltbarkeit3%
Farbe3%