Skip to content
45

thailand adapter steckdose

Skip it

Soft demand (-66.7% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 10Growth 0Conversion 84Competition 63Returns 93Price range 40Avg price 68Brand share 55Review moat 68Quality gap 25

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good789.85

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good€14.14

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Okay€5.69–€21.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad€42K

€42K/yr · 32K searches

Growth

Bad-66.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

29

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

24%

  • TESSAN33%
  • LENCENT20%
  • Anker7%
  • Denlane6%
  • vutizal5%
  • Sameriver4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€2K10%€4K15%€6K20%€8K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -66.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Portabilität20%

“Great for travelers”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Hält was er verspricht”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Produkt super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Einfache Handhabung, funktioniert tadellos”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Bestens gepasst”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Fairer Preis- guter Adapter”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker6%

“Tadelloser Steckeradapter”

Aufladen5%

“Fast charging”

Stärke4%

“Solide”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt4%

“Top Adapter”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen15%

“Unbrauchbar - Laptop laden nicht möglich”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker14%

“Sehr wackeliger Stecker”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Sehr schlechtes Produkt”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt13%

“Eingeschränkt Kompatibel”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Sind beide nach dem 1. rein stecken kaputt gegangen”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Zu lockerer Sitz”

Konnektivität – insgesamt5%

“kein Schutzleiter verbunden”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“schaltet diese wieder aus”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Irreführend”

Stärke2%

“Not solid”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße25%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt19%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker13%
Funktionalität insgesamt6%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Aufladen6%
Qualität insgesamt4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Gewicht schwer3%
Konnektivität – insgesamt3%