Skip to content
52

samsung galaxy s23 ultra ladegerät

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (12.0% search→purchase), but a small market ($30K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 7Growth 17Conversion 95Competition 64Returns 91Price range 40Avg price 53Brand share 83Review moat 36Quality gap 50

Conversion

Great12.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great52%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Good€12.34

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay€6.25–€20.89

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,857.38

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-16.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€30K

€30K/yr · 20K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

24 falling

Sellers

146

Top-5 brand share

52%

Open market

41%

  • AGEEMY16%
  • Sunrson11%
  • LUOSIKE10%
  • Samsung8%
  • ipremium8%
  • TUMABER6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€1K10%€3K15%€4K20%€6K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 32 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -16.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen54%

“Wireless Charger”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Produkt so, wie es sein soll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Super Preise/Leistung”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Recht fit”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%

“Adaptar”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Easy use”

Stärke1%

“Solide”

Effizienz1%

“Funktioniert”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker1%

“other plugs without a problem”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen30%

“USB Ladegerät ist defekt”

Haltbarkeit24%

“Sehr schnell defekt”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Qualität null”

Heizung4%

“der Stecker wird aber ziemlich warm”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Dont work”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Defekt”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker3%

“löst sich der USB stecker vom Kabel, - nichts geht mehr”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Etwas Gross”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%

“Funktioniert nicht mit Samsung”

Konnektivität – insgesamt2%

“Steckerverbindung abgefallen”

Top return reasons

Aufladen44%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt12%
Gesamtgröße11%
Funktionalität insgesamt9%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker5%
Heizung2%
Konnektivität – insgesamt2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%