Skip to content
57

samsung ep-ta800n

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 66Growth 23Conversion 71Competition 67Returns 95Price range 60Avg price 63Brand share 44Review moat 42Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Good6.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good45%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good€643K

€643K/yr · 731K searches

Avg price

Good€13.55

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€6.25–€28.39

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,347.78

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-4.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 45% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

197

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

17%

  • Samsung49%
  • AGEEMY11%
  • Powersky8%
  • MORELOCO6%
  • LUOSIKE4%
  • Gyusity4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (12 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€26K8%€51K12%€77K16%€103K1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 32 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen55%

“Great value fast charger with cables”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Produkt so, wie es sein soll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Great value fast charger with cables”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Recht fit”

Stärke1%

“Solide”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt1%

“Adaptar”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker1%

“other plugs without a problem”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%

“Easy use”

Funktionalität insgesamt1%

“Verarbeitung ok”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen29%

“USB Ladegerät ist defekt”

Haltbarkeit25%

“Futchtbar”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Qualität null”

Heizung4%

“der Stecker wird aber ziemlich warm”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker4%

“Ohne USB-Buchse”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Defekt”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Etwas Gross”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“Geschenkt ist noch zu teuer”

Konnektivität – insgesamt2%

“Steckerverbindung abgefallen”

Top return reasons

Aufladen42%
Gesamtgröße13%
Funktionalität insgesamt9%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt9%
Defekt Material/Teile7%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker7%
Heizung2%
Konnektivität – insgesamt2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Qualität insgesamt2%