Skip to content
54

powerbank für samsung handy

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($20.17 avg), but a small market ($32K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 8Growth 54Conversion 35Competition 66Returns 68Price range 76Avg price 88Brand share 74Review moat 27Quality gap 78

Avg price

Great€20.17

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great€8.33–€36.19

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good60%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good2.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Good+26.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay2.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay3,768.21

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€32K

€32K/yr · 56K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

21 rising

Sellers

136

Top-5 brand share

60%

Open market

34%

  • Samsung24%
  • iPosible11%
  • Aobbow10%
  • Eissix10%
  • charmast6%
  • Ekrist5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€9556%€2K9%€3K12%€4K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +26.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen26%

“super powerbank mit wireless charging”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Good quality”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Good choice for this price point”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Macht seinen Job”

Portabilität6%

“Handy”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Wirklich super easy”

Akkulaufzeit4%

“Batterie super”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Size”

Stärke3%

“robust”

Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption2%

“Der Magnet hält gut am Handy”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen30%

“it recharge very very slow”

Haltbarkeit11%

“Haltbarkeit”

Gewicht schwer6%

“Gross etwas Gewicht”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Do not buy this – it is bad quality”

Akkulaufzeit4%

“Akku nach wenigen Monaten defekt”

Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption3%

“The magnet is very weak”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Small steht wohl nicht für 10.000”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“unfunktionell”

Heizung3%

“It heats up slightly”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“Defekt”

Top return reasons

Aufladen27%
Gewicht schwer20%
Gesamtgröße15%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt6%
Funktionalität insgesamt6%
Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption5%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Heizung2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Akkulaufzeit2%