Skip to content
57

powerbank 26800mah

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($29.62 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 16Growth 51Conversion 57Competition 74Returns 69Price range 91Avg price 95Brand share 63Review moat 25Quality gap 65

Avg price

Incredible€29.62

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€12.38–€68.47

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good40%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Returns

Good2.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good67%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good4.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Good+21.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad4,833.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€66K

€66K/yr · 46K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 40% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

158

Top-5 brand share

67%

Open market

24%

  • UGREEN20%
  • CFIAI15%
  • YILANS12%
  • INIU12%
  • Anker9%
  • charmast9%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€2K6%€4K9%€6K12%€8K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 34 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +21.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen30%

“Handy wird super schnell geladen”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Innovative starke Power Bank zu einem hervorragenden Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Macht seinen Job”

Akkulaufzeit6%

“hat viel Power”

Stärke5%

“Robust”

Portabilität4%

“Super Powerbank”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“fein in der Handhabung.”

Speicherkapazität3%

“Super Kapazität”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen31%

“it recharge very very slow”

Gewicht schwer10%

“Schwergewicht”

Haltbarkeit9%

“sehr schnell defekt”

Akkulaufzeit4%

“Battery Cycle bei 38 - habe sie immer bei längerem nichtgebrauch bei 50 prozent gelagert - jetzt defekt”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Qualität unzureichend”

Speicherkapazität4%

“0 Kapazität”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Funktioniert nicht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Gewichtsangabe irreführend”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Bisschen globig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%

“Schade für ein Produkt, das ursprünglich mal 140 Euro gekostet hat”

Top return reasons

Gewicht schwer31%
Aufladen21%
Gesamtgröße20%
Funktionalität insgesamt5%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt4%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Zertifizierungen2%
Produktzustand2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Akkulaufzeit1%