Skip to content
61

papes

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 83Growth 22Conversion 95Competition 72Returns 99Price range 54Avg price 65Brand share 43Review moat 50Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.3M

€1.3M/yr · 731K searches

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Good€13.75

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€4.17–€27.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,492.43

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-5.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 flat

Sellers

71

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

16%

  • OCB34%
  • RAW18%
  • OCB / High Champ16%
  • Gizeh7%
  • GRANNY'S WEED5%
  • GIZEH / High Champ5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€51K8%€103K12%€154K16%€205K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 37 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -5.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KPrime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis36%

“Super Deal”

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Passt perfekt”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit4%

“Akaziengummi haftet perfekt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Absolut praktisch”

Farbe2%

“Coole Farben und lassen sich schön drehen”

Dicke1%

“Das Papier ist angenehm dünn”

Design insgesamt1%

“Die Designs sind für die Abwechslung auch echt cool”

Stärke1%

“aber doch stabil genug um unproblematisch zu sein beim rollen.”

What buyers complain about

Haftung/Klebrigkeit41%

“Klebestreifen löst sich ständig”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Absolut ungeeignet”

Dicke6%

“sind sehr dünn”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Ansonsten absolut unbrauchbar”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Ich war erst skeptisch wegen der geringen Preise”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Weniger drin als angegeben”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Ok. tup bisschen klein”

Feucht/Trocken3%

“Leider war ein drittel der päckchen nicht mehr zu gebrauchen da sie anscheinend feucht geworden sind, schade da die papes sonst eigentlich sehr gut sind”

Geschmack3%

“haben kaum Eigengeschmack”

Stärke2%

“Extrem instabil”

Top return reasons

Haftung/Klebrigkeit30%
Gesamtgröße20%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt13%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Funktionalität insgesamt5%
Filterung5%
Dicke4%
Feucht/Trocken3%
Geruch3%
Zertifizierungen2%