Skip to content
59

on ear kopfhörer mit kabel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 67Growth 24Conversion 50Competition 68Returns 89Price range 80Avg price 57Brand share 52Review moat 21Quality gap 84

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great€3.82–€65.39

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good€655K

€655K/yr · 1.3M searches

Avg price

Good€12.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay4.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-2.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad11,343.69

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 flat

Sellers

114

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

20%

  • Apple22%
  • JBL20%
  • LUDOS13%
  • Sony11%
  • Sennheiser8%
  • ZJXD6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€26K8%€52K12%€79K16%€105K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 35 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -2.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Audioqualität33%

“Super sound”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Quality”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Best price for authentic apple earpods”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Produkt ist wie beschrieben”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Bass4%

“Sehr guter Klang (Bass)”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Simple”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Kurzlebig”

Mikrofon2%

“Very good sound and microphone, I like it”

Komfort insgesamt2%

“I prefer this to the other brands as it feels super comfortable to wear for hours on end”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit24%

“Fällt auseinander”

Audioqualität14%

“Sound echt miserabel”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Qualität fraglich”

Bass5%

“Bass so gut wie garnicht vorhanden”

Geräuschpegel4%

“Schlechter Klang”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Audiolautstärke3%

“alles klingt sehr dumpf”

Mikrofon2%

“Microphone funktioniert nicht”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passform ungeeignet fürs Ohr”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“Kopfhörer wurden defekt geliefert”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße22%
Audioqualität14%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt14%
Funktionalität insgesamt12%
Konnektivität – insgesamt4%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Geräuschpegel4%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker3%
Mikrofon2%