Skip to content
52

magsafe

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($24.08 avg), but soft demand (-21.6% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 88Growth 14Conversion 41Competition 39Returns 74Price range 88Avg price 95Brand share 36Review moat 24Quality gap 58

Avg price

Incredible€24.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Great€1.6M

€1.6M/yr · 2.0M searches

Price range

Great€7.55–€89.20

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Good2.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay3.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay83%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad5,431.74

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-21.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 flat

Sellers

44

Top-5 brand share

83%

Open market

13%

  • Apple50%
  • Anker13%
  • KLiHD12%
  • JSAUX4%
  • OANDYS4%
  • Rose-Rider4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€161K20%€321K30%€482K40%€642K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -21.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen22%

“⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ High-Speed Charging in elegantem Design”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Produkt wie versprochen”

Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption7%

“Der Magnet hält super mit dem am Handy”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Zum Aktionspreis gekauft - Great Deal - thx Amazon”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Ganz easy”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passt”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%

“Es funktioniert auch gut mit einer Handyhülle”

Stärke3%

“Solide”

Akkulaufzeit3%

“1 Ladung fast 100% bei ca.12% noch im Akku”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen33%

“Slow Charger sagt mein iPhone”

Haltbarkeit10%

“1,5 Monate defekt”

Heizung5%

“Wird übelst schnell warm/heiß”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Waste”

Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption4%

“Magnet löst sich”

Akkulaufzeit4%

“Zurückgesendet Akku könnte besser sein”

Dicke3%

“Dünn und unauffällig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Geld definitiv nicht wert”

Gesamtgröße2%

“spürbar klobig”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Funktioniert null”

Top return reasons

Aufladen29%
Gesamtgröße18%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt10%
Funktionalität insgesamt8%
Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption5%
Heizung4%
Gewicht schwer4%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Akkulaufzeit2%