Skip to content
50

lost mary

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (3.6★), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 24Growth 37Conversion 64Competition 24Returns 99Price range 67Avg price 64Brand share 0Review moat 94Quality gap 99

Quality gap

Incredible3.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great122.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€7.49–€30.39

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good€13.66

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Okay+9.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€95K

€95K/yr · 122K searches

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 falling

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • ELF Bar75%
  • Mari & Juan15%
  • Generisch11%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€9K20%€19K30%€28K40%€38K101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 12 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +9.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSpike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis35%

“fairer Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt20%

“Alles wie versprochen”

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Gute Qualität,”

Haltbarkeit5%

“die Pods sehr langhaltig.”

Aufladen5%

“Der Akku mit USB-C lädt zügig”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Praktisches und einfaches Pod-System”

What buyers complain about

Auslaufsicher30%

“Verlieren liquid nach wenig Zeit”

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Absoluter Müll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Sinnlose Geldverschwendung”

Haltbarkeit14%

“Halten nicht lange”

Geschmack insgesamt4%

“Nach dem zweiten Mal auffüllen, schmeckt es einfach gar nicht mehr”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Bisher funktioniert 1 Pod aus einer Packung nicht”

Zufriedenheit/Vergnügen3%

“nicht zufrieden”

Feucht/Trocken3%

“plötzlich ist alles nass”

Ethischer Handel/Fairer Handel3%

“Betrug Defekte Ware”

Komfort insgesamt2%

“ist nicht angenehm”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt24%
Auslaufsicher18%
Gesamtgröße13%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt6%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Produktzustand4%
Haltbarkeit4%
Farbverblassen/Verfärbung2%