Skip to content
48

ladestecker iphone

Skip it

Prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($4.92–$16.05) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 12Growth 17Conversion 93Competition 61Returns 97Price range 9Avg price 28Brand share 81Review moat 31Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Great54%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,351.91

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay€9.32

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-16.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€50K

€50K/yr · 46K searches

Price range

Bad€4.92–€16.05

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

24 falling

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

54%

Open market

40%

  • ipremium15%
  • Aimoze13%
  • Apple12%
  • Aioneus8%
  • LumFocus6%
  • TYW6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€2K8%€4K12%€6K16%€8K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 32 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -16.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen40%

“fast charge”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Das Produkt tut, was es soll”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Super Adapter für einen fairen Preis”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker5%

“alle Ports top”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Leichte Handhabung”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Portabilität2%

“Ideal für Reisen und mehrere Geräte”

Stärke1%

“Solide”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt1%

“Adaptar”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen35%

“Ist ein Slow-charger”

Haltbarkeit17%

“Nach 1 Monat defekt”

Heizung8%

“Wird nicht warm”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker5%

“USB-C Port defekt”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Fällt schon fast von selbst raus”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“Defekt”

Geräuschpegel2%

“Geräusch - Ladegerät zischt beim laden”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“Kauf hat sich in keiner Weise gelohnt”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%

“Funktioniert nicht mit iphone”

Top return reasons

Aufladen36%
Gesamtgröße15%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt10%
Funktionalität insgesamt10%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker9%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Heizung3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Konnektivität – insgesamt2%
Qualität insgesamt2%